All solutions
Regulated & Enterprise

Secure Delivery Pipeline

Security moved into the pipeline rather than into a review at the end, with scanning, secrets management and rollback that have actually been rehearsed.

To first release
2 weeks
Security checks
Every merge
Built with
  • GitHub Actions
  • Trivy
  • Snyk
  • Terraform
  • Kubernetes
  • HashiCorp Vault

The problem

When security is a phase rather than a property of the pipeline, it arrives too late to be cheap. Findings land after the design is fixed, the team negotiates rather than fixes, and the release everyone needed last week slips again. Meanwhile the things that actually cause incidents, long-lived credentials and an untested rollback, are nobody in particular's job.

How we would sequence it

  1. 01Move dependency, container and static analysis into the pipeline, failing the build rather than filing a ticket
  2. 02Replace long-lived credentials with short-lived, scoped ones issued from a managed vault
  3. 03Rehearse rollback as a routine step so it is a dial rather than an emergency
  4. 04Separate environments and enforce least privilege on the deploy path itself
  5. 05Produce the evidence an auditor asks for as an artefact of the pipeline, not a manual exercise

This solution describes our method for a class of problem. It is not a record of a completed client engagement, and the figures above are scope estimates rather than measured results.

Have this problem?

Scope this with us